1. What does the Martin-Quinn score attempt to measure? The score represents how left or right the justice is by taking their votes and placing them on a scale. The more positive the score, the more right the justice is, and vice versa.
2. What trend do you notice as justices serve on the Supreme Court for many years? Justices have become more and more liberal as time goes on, and Republican justices become liberal faster than Democratic nominees.
3. How does the Greenhouse Effect theory try to explain this phenomenon? This is also known as the Liptak Effect, but it states that justices will try not to be to left wing or right wing, in order to appeal to the majority, who are moderates, but funny enough, this makes them more liberal overtime.
4. How does the Cocktail Party theory try to explain this? This theory states that justices are likely to lean liberal in attempt to fit in with other justices. But this is usually untrue since it depends on D.C. people being liberals.
5. How might the historical reputation of a justice effect their decision making? Historically conservative justices have a bad rep, so overtime they may lean more liberal.
6. Why have conservatives been disappointed so far by Chief Justice John Roberts? He ruled in favor of the Affordable Care Act, so conservatives question his stance,
7. Of all the theories for why this occurs, which do you think is most realistic? Why?
I have to agree with the Greehouse Effect since it is the most plausible as media plays a big role in the public's view of politicians, so it is understandable they they'll try to appeal to them.